Implement a common, open standard for electronic publication of timely, comprehensive
and forward-looking information on resources provided through development cooperation.
The indicator scoring is split equally between these three dimensions. There have been persuasive arguments that the quality of the content of the data should also be measured. The challenge of adding this fourth dimension is to devise objective logic that can be run by a machine to assess the quality of the data.
Indicator gives equal weight to timeliness, comprehensiveness and forward looking
Retain same rule, but consider adding a measure of quality
Many comments referred to the need to measure data quality. Need to examine quality tests applied by CRS and IATI and see if there is a common approach that could be applied (e.g. on completeness of textual information, presence of key fields dependent on activity status). See if can arrive at a single score and consider adding it as a 4th dimension - perhaps with less weight than for the data-driven dimensions.